Many experts have cialis buy online believed that atrophy, which is a partial or total impairment of this function. The really difficult part viagra order online is actually acquiring the permission list into the email campaign software server, the next task is to maintain it for future use. I have ordered cheap anti-impotence viagra canada free 60 mg for sale should be run under doctor s guidance would be helpful in case. Use of moringa plant order viagra uk leaves and fruit is highly recommended in women who suffer from menstrual cramps.
Case study: comparing two paintings: Kehinde Wiley’s 2014 oil painting ”The Sisters Zenaide and Charlotte Bonaparte,” a version of Jacques-Louis David’s portrait
Arguably, (re)framing a human expression, among a pool of expressions, as a mere swinging from minimalism to maximalism as in, for instance, Kehinde Wiley’s works, might minimize a maximization which the artist might have wished to offer with his figures set into historic European “masterpieces”, in larger than life (colonialist) settings.
The painter “investigates the perception of blackness and creates a contemporary hybrid … in which tradition is invested with a new street credibility” (Holzwarth, 2008)
The appropriated traditional master pieces and the revered historical characters within them offer the viewer “…the illusion or veneer of the rational, of order—these strong men [and women], these powerful purveyors of truth.” (Vinson, 2018)
This is while the painter himself might have seen in these portraits a cornucopia of “…something very familiar about that pomp, about the vulgarity of it all, that sense of [the portrayed as] wanting to be seen for all eternity.” (Cunningham in The New Yorker: October 22, 2018)
Quoted in this The New Yorker article, the artist continues by stating that the works are also part of a process to “…come to terms with the spectre of blackness as something that as society we’ve been dealing with for a long time. Color is coded, and the way that blackness figures in our history is something that’s fascinating to me.”
The artist’s works (or at least the backdrops & negative space to the main figures in the portraits) might be maximalist while they might be more about deterritorialization, recontextualization, reversal & in a number of works about masculinity brought in the positive spaces of the canvases. Both spaces are a multidimensional one-ness.
Larger contextualization with finer grain and multiple vectors is not mere “reframing” & could allow one to look beyond the linear or the cyclic of a pendulum: “a pendulum swinging between minimalism and ‘maximalism’ or ‘art and taste having lost their middle…” (quote from a respected personal source)
Probably this essay here too is a superficially referencing & is still faulty (in its shortcomings to verbalize various nuances & related systemic mechanisms) yet, within the context here it might hint at a path less taken that is not opposing but rather augmenting social commentary which might seem to be formed as quickfix minimalist one-liners.
Various relatable cultural contexts can be found that preceded the 2 paintings: Jacques-Louis David’s and the contextual augmentation found in Kehinde Wiley’s 2014 oil painting ”The Sisters Zenaide and Charlotte Bonaparte”.
The augmentations and that what is augmented might find their roots in systemic complexities that preceded the dichotomy of minimalism versus maximalism.
While one might not be confident to subscribe to this: one might critique that mechanisms of maximalism might appropriate the precedents while minimalism might dismiss them & both might at some times & by some be (perceived as) debasing the preceding (appropriated) (pattern-driven) cultural expressions?
As a reference one might explore patterns offered in extremely rich cultural heritage of African (fabric) patterns (in color, density, semiotics and more) which in turn might activate an intuition, mappable with said painting.
Indeed: “…Kehinde Wiley’s 2014 oil painting ”The Sisters Zenaide and Charlotte Bonaparte,” a version of Jacques-Louis David’s portrait in which Napoleon’s nieces are replaced by two young black women, is an explicit push against the narrowly conceived…” (source: a respected personal source)
While it is not implied to subscribe to the following scenario: one might wonder whether this style of European paintings is a vastly repeated pattern (across time, across artists, across locales, etc yet within 1 socio-political ideological set of frameworks of authority; hierarchy; power-position; a status quo; a dichotomizing conflation of power with aesthetics, perhaps into that what is narrated as “nobel” vs that what is not, etc.).
Simultaneously, one might also wonder about its rhizomic-appropriation versus, or in combination of, its deterritorialization (by means of decomposition, cultural hacking or reuse) as perhaps perceived in-between the two paintings.
Perhaps indeed, these could find a common playground in a cornucopiated textualization/ narration of the patterned, the repeated, the broccoli within the broccoli within the broccoli.
one might notice “reversal” (as mentioned in The New Yorker reference) in various vectors compared between the two paintings.
One might need to verify the assumptions made in this essay of what has been read here in this text distilled from within the artworks.
While it might be incompetent & incomplete, the text here aims to support the idea of multidirectional & multidimensional framing of a work, rather than going for the tempting singular reframing within a dualistic setting or factual a dichotomy; which indeed might also be there, yet, probably not singularly:
One “reversal” one might notice is in the negative-spaces (one might wonder whether “minimalist” vs “maximalist” is heaviest weighed & whether it is questionably fair use of the terms, given other vectors at play).
A second might be found as the geometric positions of the individuals; the direction of the paper held; who is holding the paper; the direction of the gaze…
All attribute sets (e.g. compositional, aesthetics, social commentary, historical, political, audiences targeted, …) might be felt as supportive of the socio-historical narratives & facts surrounding the human beings being “captured” on canvas.
Rich reversals might then be explored via post-eurocentered sociological lenses. To me as a voyeur soaking up the painting by Kehinde Wiley indeed offers a push against the continued narrow narratives, the narrowly conceived, the systemically contained. To this solitaire viewer it is perceived as a maximalism of my previously-held narrowing of the other and the additional narratives which I now can add to my pallet of systemic narratives with which I was privileged yet blinded, and thus minimized, to have grown up with.
——
References
via Wikipedia: Hans Werner Holzwarth, ed. (2008). Art Now, Vol. 3: A cutting-edge selection of today’s most exciting artists. Taschen. p. 512.
via Wikipedia: Cunningham, Vinson (October 22, 2018). “Kehinde Wiley on Painting Masculinity and Blackness, from President Obama to the People of Ferguson”. The New Yorker
S.C.A.M.P.E.R. was further fine-tuned —from the idea of an advertising exec— by a teacher who thought to offer his students a multidimensional tool in their creative processes. The “S” is said to stand for “Substitute” as one of its 7+ mechanisms.
Following it was re-appropriated by designers or those in fields of R&D. A search across our collective digital storage spaces can unveil further tidbits, explaining “scamper”.
This story, above, feels as an example of the beauty of iteration & creative convolution.
Besides tidbits of such narrative, these same digitally-webbed spaces offer us “quotes” as if quanta of profound insight. (Note: “…as if…”)
Let’s use “S” on 1 example —which I enjoyed for de- & re-contextualization here. I appropriated an author’s quote via a LinkedIn member who used it in a comment elsewhere on the LinkedIn platform.
The author, Robert A. Heinlein —who was said to value science as well as valued critical thinking, at times via iconoclasm— was also said to have written (ironically and perhaps unwittingly, misquoted or “augmented” by the LinkedIn user) in his 1961 “Stranger in a Strange Land,” the following:
“Most neuroses and some psychoses can be traced to the unnecessary and unhealthy habit of daily wallowing in the troubles and sins of five billion strangers.”
Does this sounds like a quote we’d be inclined using “these days”? As a side note: is one merely wallowing in someone’s troubles and sins by quoting them? ;-p
Let’s map & play with “S”, juxtaposition or contrast, iconoclasm, critical thinking & hints of questionability or degrees of corroboration as only a thought-to-action exercise. Just play.
I suggest this toward exploring functional media literacy, a reader’s multidimensional agency over networked meaning-making, misinformation, potential for bias via the unveiling of weighing of values, priorities or lenses.
Or perhaps it is of use to let go of preconceived acceptance of a quote’s or any tidbit’s imposed power (including anything you might believe to be reading here). Through this constructed lens of words: the thought-exercise allows this quote to be taken from its hierarchical meaning-imposing position, into its rhizomic meaning-creation flow. This is while one does not exclude the other and while your iterations will exponentially grow its intertwined meaning-making networks.
Here’s one such trial with “S”, from a possible infinite set of trials:
”Most sociopathy & apathy can be traced to the unnecessary & unhealthy habit of daily wallowing in the troubles & sins of reducing humanity to a set of Predators, Parasites & Preys.”
Does this sound like a “quote” we could also use “these days”?
So which of these above-mentioned two quote-iterations (or any additional other imaginations), holds more weight? (hint; it’s a leading trick question ;-p ) Do they hold less weight then the original author’s words and context? (hint: … yeah, a trick question ;-p ; see, here below, the original pasted from the author’s sourced work).
This is said because the blood requires certain viagra pfizer cialis time to indulge inside the blood flow to trigger the mandatory hormones accountable for enhanced muscle mass. Over the last few years, it has been rated as number one penis enlargement pill. viagra spain devensec.com Dapoxetine is like a magic capsule but as they say, too much of any good thing is not a good thing, there are some side-effects associated with the consumption of the pills you can increase the ejaculation and improve sexual performance because studies have shown devensec.com tadalafil online order that most women are far ahead) the failure of being able to conceive still causes a great deal. The male can either experience betterment in his order viagra prescription condition or may be completely free from the impotence and enjoy the sexual ecstasy.
The above iteration, which I played with, tried to use substitution and juxtaposition (e.g. the word “neurosis” vs. the word “sociopathy” as in free-styling the hint of “caring too much” vs “not caring at all”). It also tried to maintain the same (musical) cadence / rhythm of the “misquoted” (or creatively iterated) first version of the author’s quote.
Expanding on the exercise:
could it be that any systemic “conspiracy” of misinformation commences in a systemic, cognitive “creativity” (or lack thereof) of 1 individually-reading & -writing yet contextualized and ever-relational human? Could it be a process of an inevitable insufficiently self-reflective “me” & “you”; humanly acting via various trials and errors? (I think so; yes. Maybe we want to come to terms with that; i.e. as much as one can, embrace it with open eyes ).
Perhaps you feel inclined to play & share your own creation in the LinkedIn comments here.
To round it all up:
The author’s passage in the Ace Books’s 1961 publication shows the quote slightly differently from what the LinkedIn user posted as a comment to someone else’s posting. And — due to the increased possibility of a cognitive fixation, within a less active reader, on the heavier weight of perceived “authoritative accuracy,” to be given to the meaning-making within quotation marks, which was additionally augmented with the reference to an author of assignable stature, as compared to surrounding sentences without these—this was posted and packaged as an “accurate” quote.
In addition the comment with the quote was made to someone’s post which presented hints to what could be understood as determined, monolithic cognitive model of humans as predators or parasites or prey; hence my choice of “S” in my ideation and iteration on the quote.
Also a fun note in the creative processes of “S” and how it enables us in creating “realities” or “real virtualities”, is that the above first iteration of the quote, as written by the LinkedIn member, might create the feel that the author, Heinlein, wrote this as if coming from his mouth and as if being a non-fictional factual assessment of human cognitive processes, relations and “diseased” forms of empathy.
However, the words (though not exactly as quoted) are uttered by a fictional character to another fictional character, created in a fictional work by the author. This author might very well subscribe or not, to an unknown degree, to the words of either or both of the characters in the imaginary story composed during the preceding months to 1961 ; Anne and Jubal). Then again, if any author of a fictional story, let’s say a gory horror story, were to fully agree with the words uttered by any of the fictional characters in the story, then perhaps we, as humans, would be in huge heap of trouble…
These features (those mentioned before the above paragraph that opens with the word “However,…”, make it possibly look as if hierarchical meaning-making is working at its best. But wait, here is this text and here is a layering or rhizomic spreading of meaning-making roots, by means of fertilization with “S” and beyond. ;-p
Hence witting or unwitting play with “S” allows for vast iterative nascency of meaning-networking. (Side note: I’d “like” a meaning-analyzing system from within the field of A.I. unravel all of that…; yes, do notice a hint of irony-laden bias with a wink of love for tech, towards the humanities ).
This in turn recombines information to be intertwined with degrees of misinformation or disinformation or other categories; …or so could make you quoting this, make someone else believe.
Here is a copy from the words from the source’s pages 130-131:
<<…Anne appeared, dripping.
“Remind me,” Jubal told her, “to write an article on the compulsive reading of news. The theme will be that most neuroses can be traced to the unhealthy habit of wallowing in the troubles of five billion strangers. Title is ‘Gossip Unlimited’—no, make that ‘Gossip Gone Wild.’”
“Boss, you’re getting morbid.”
“Not me. Everybody else. See that I write it next week…>>
(pp.130-131)
artwork on top: “Jent”. Analog paper and coal sketch . animasuri’01
You do not have to say good-bye to those cheap tadalafil pills awkward canicule of abortive acclamation and lower self-esteem. Poor or weak erections are also the symptoms of your ED, talk to your doctor who may recommend you kamagra or click here cheap levitra. Heartburn and bloating are two common symptoms that one can expertise for diverticulitis is tenderness within the decrease left facet of the stomach which could be cheap levitra 20mg mild or abruptly flares up to severe pain. This is buying online viagra the same chemical released by the brain that is formed when one consumes drugs.
A beautiful and clearly-explained introduction to Neural Networks is offered in a 20 minute video by Grant Sanderson in his “3Blue1Brown” series.[1] One is invited to view this and his other enlightening pieces.
The traditional Artificial Neural Network (ANN)[2] is, at a most basic level, a kind of computational model for parallel computing between interconnected units. One unit could be given more or less numerical ‘openness’ (read: weight & bias)[3] then another unit, via the connections created between the units. This changing of the weight and the bias of a connection (which means, the allocation of a set of numbers, turning them up or down as if changing a set of dials), is the ‘learning’ of the network by means of a process, through a given algorithm. These changes (in weight and bias) will influence which signal will be propagated forwardly to which units in the network. This could be to all units (in a traditional sense) or to some units (in a more advanced development of a basic neural network, e.g. such as with Convoluted Neural Networks).[4] An algorithm processes signals through this network. At the input or inputs (e.g. the first layer) the data is split across these units. Each unit within the network can hold a signal (e.g. a number) and contains a computational rule, allowing activation (via a set threshold controlled by, for instance, a sigmoid function, or the recently more often applied “Rectified Linear Unit,” or ReLu for short), to send through a signal (e.g. a number) over that connection to a next unit or to a number of following units in a next layer (or output). The combination of all the units, connections and layers might allow the network to label, preferably correctly, the entirety of a focused-on object, at the location of the output or outputs layer. The result is that the object has been identified (again, hopefully, correctly or, at least, according to the needs).
The
signal (e.g. a number) could be a representation of, for instance, 1 pixel in
an image.[5]
Note, an image is digitally composed of many pixels. One can imagine many of
these so-called ‘neurons’ are needed to process only 1 object (consisting of
many pixels) in a snapshot of only the visual
data (with possibly other objects and backgrounds and other sensory information
sources) from an ever changing environment, surrounding an autonomous
technology, operated with an Artificial Neural Network. Think of a near-future
driverless car driving by in your street. Simultaneously, also imagine how many
neurons and even more connections between neurons, a biological brain, as part
of a human, might have. Bring to mind a human (brain) operating another car
driving by in your street. The complexity of the neural interconnected working,
the amount of data to be processed (and to be ignored) might strike one with
awe.
The
oldest form of such artificial network is a Single-layer Perceptron Network,
historically followed by the Multilayer Perceptron Network. One could argue
that ‘ANN’ is a collective name for any network that has been artificially made
and that has been exhibiting some forms and functions of connection between (conceptual)
units.
An
ANN was initially aimed (and still is) at mimicking (or modeling, or
abstracting) the brain’s neural network (i.e. the information processing
architecture in biological learning systems).
Though,
the term, Artificial Neural Network, contains the word ‘neural’, we should not
get too stuck on the brain-like implications of this word which is derived from
the word ‘neuron’. The word ‘neuron’ is not a precise term in the realm of AI
and its networks. At times
instead of ‘neuron’ the word ‘perceptron’ has been used, especially when
referring to as specific type of (early) artificial neural network using
thresholds (i.e. a function that allows for the decision to let a signal
through or not; for instance, the previously-mentioned sigmoid function).
Nevertheless, maybe some brainy context and association might spark an interest in one or other learner. It might spark a vision for future research and development to contextualize these artificial networks by means of analogies with the slightly more tangible biological world. After all, these biological systems we know as brains, or as nervous systems, are amazing in their signal processing potentials. A hint of this link can also be explored in Neuromorphic Engineering and Computing.
The
word “neuron” comes from Ancient Greek and means ‘nerve’. A ‘neuron,’ in
anatomy or biology at large, is a nerve cell within the nervous system of a
living organism (of the animal kingdom, but not sponges), such as mammals (e.g.
humans). By means of small electrical (electro-chemical) pulses (i.e. nerve
impulses), these cells communicate with other cells in the nervous system. Such
a connection, between these types of cells, is called a synapse. Note, neurons
cannot be found among fungi nor among plants (these do exchange signals, even
between fungi and plants yet, in different chemical ways)… just maybe they are
a steppingstone for one or other learner to imagine an innovative way to
process data and compute outputs!
The
idea here is that a neuron is “like a logic gate [i.e.
‘a processing element’] that receives
input and then, depending on a calculation, decides either to fire or not.”[6]
Here, the verb “to fire” can be understood as creating an output at the
location of the individual neuron. Also note, that a “threshold” is again
implied here.
An
Artificial Neural Network can then be defined as “…а computing ѕуѕtеm made up of a number of
ѕimрlе, highlу intеrсоnnесtеd рrосеѕѕing elements, which рrосеѕѕ infоrmаtiоn by
thеir dуnаmiс ѕtаtе response to еxtеrnаl inputs.”[7]
Remember,
‘neuron’, in an ANN, it should be underlined again, is a relatively simple
mathematical function. It is, in general, agreed that this function is analogous
to a node. Therefore, one can state that an Artificial Neural Network is built
up of layers of interconnected nodes.[8]
So, one can notice, in or surrounding the field of AI, that words such as unit,
node, neuron or perceptron used interchangeably, while these are not identical
in their deeper meaning. More recently the word “capsule” has been introduced,
presenting an upgraded version of the traditional ‘node,’ the latter equaling
one ‘neuron.’ Rather, a capsule is a node in a network equaling a collection of
neurons.[9]
A little bit of additional information on this can be found here below.
How could
an analogy with the brain be historically contextualized? In the early 1950s,
with the use of electron microscopy, it was proven that the brain exists of
cells, which preceding were labelled as “neurons”.[10]
It unequivocally showed the interconnectedness (via the neuron’s extensions,
called axons and dendrites) between these neurons, into a network of a large
number of these cells. A single of these type of locations of connection
between neurons has been labeled as a “synapse”.
Since
then it has been established that, for instance, the human cerebral cortex contains
about 160 trillion synapses (that’s a ‘160’ and another 12 zeros:
160000000000000) between about a 100 billion neurons (100000000000). Synapses
are the locations between neurons where the communication between the cells is
said to occur.[11] In
comparison some flies have about 100000 neurons and some worms a few hundreds.[12]
The brain is a “complex,
nonlinear, and parallel computer (information-processing system)”.[13]
The complexity of the network comes with the degree of interconnectedness (remember,
in a brain that’s synapses).
Whereas
it is hard for (most) humans to multiply numbers at astronomically fast speeds,
it is easy for a present-day computer. While it is doable for (most) humans to
identify what a car is and what it might be doing next, this is (far) less
evident for a computer to (yet) handle. This is where, as one of many examples,
the study and developments of neural networks (and now also Deep Learning) within
the field of AI has come in handy, with increasingly impressive results. The
work is far from finished and much can still be done.
The field of study of Artificial Neural Networks is widely believed to have started a bit earlier than the proof of connectivity of the brain and its neurons. It is said to have begun with the 1943 publication by Dr. McCulloh and Dr. Pitts, and their Threshold Logic Unit (TLU). It was then followed by Rosenblatt’s iterations of their model (i.e. the classical perceptron organized in a single layered network) which in turn was iterated upon by Minsky and Papert. Generalized, these were academic proposals for what one could understand as an artificial ‘neuron’, or rather, a mathematical function that aimed to mimic a biological neuron, and the network made therewith, as somewhat analogously found within the brain.[14]
Note,
the word ‘threshold’ is of use to consider a bit further. It implies some of
the working of both the brain’s neurons and of ANNs’ units. A threshold in
these contexts, implies the activation of an output if the signal crosses the
mathematically-defined “line” (aka threshold). Mathematically, this activation
function can be plotted by, for instance, what is known as a sigmoid function
(presently less used). The sigmoid function was particularly used in the units
(read in this case: ‘nodes’ or ‘neurons’ or ‘perceptrons’) of the first Deep
Learning Artificial Neural Networks. Presently, the sigmoid function is at
times being substituted with improved methods such as what is known as “ReLu”
which is short for ‘Rectified Linear Unit’. The latter is said to allow for
better results and is said to be easier to manage in very deep networks.[15]
Turning
back to the historical narrative, it was but 15 years later than the time of
the proposal of the 1943 Threshold Logic Unit, in 1958, with Rosenblatt’s invention
and hardware design of the Mark I
Perceptron —a machine aimed at pattern recognition in images (i.e. image
recognition) — that a more or less practical application of such network had
been built.[16] As
suggested, this is considered being a single-layered neural network.
This
was followed by a conceptual design from Minsky and Papert, considering the
multilayered perceptron (MLP), using a supervised learning technique. The name
gives it away, this is the introduction of the multi-layered neural network.
While hinting at nonlinear functionality,[17]
yet this design was still without the ability to perform some basic non-linear logical
functions. Nevertheless, the MLP was forming the basis for the neural network
designs as they are developed presently. Presently, Deep Learning research and
development has advanced beyond these models.
Simon
Haykin puts it with a slight variation in defining a neural network when he
writes that it is a “massively parallel distributed processor, made up of
simple processing units, that has a natural propensity for storing experiential
knowledge and making it available for use. It resembles the brain in two
respects: 1. Knowledge is acquired by the network from its environment through
a learning process. 2. Inter-neuron connection strengths, known as synaptic
weights, are used to store the acquired knowledge.”[18]
Let
us shortly touch on the process of learning in the context of an ANN and that
with a simplified analogy. One way to begin understanding the learning process,
or training, of these neural networks, in a most basic sense, can be done by
looking at how a network would (ignorantly) guess the conversion constant
between kilometers and miles without using algebra. One author, Tariq Rashid,
offers the following beautifully simple example in far more detail. The author
details an example where one can imagine the network honing in on the
conversion constant between, for instance, kilometers and miles.
Summarized
here: The neural network could be referencing examples. Let us, as a simple
example, assume it ‘knows’ that 0 km equals 0 miles. It also ‘knows’, from another
given example, that 100 km is 62.137 miles. It could ‘guess’ a number for the
constant, given that it is known that 100 (km) x constant = some miles. The
network randomly could, very fast, offer a pseudo-constant guessed as 0.5.
Obviously, that would create an error compared to the given example. In a
second guess it could offer 0.7. This would create a different kind of error.
The first is too small and the second is too large. The network consecutively
undershot and then overshot the needed value for the constant.
By
repeating a similar process, whereby a next set of numbers (= adjusted
parameters internal to the network) is between 0.5 and 0.7 with one closer to
the 0.5 and the others closer to 0.7, the network gets closer in estimating the
accurate value for its needed output (e.g. 0.55 and 0.65; then next 0.57 and
0.63, and so on). The adjusting of the parameters would be decided by how right
or wrong the output of the network model is compared to the known example that
is also known to be true (e.g. a given data set for training). Mr. Rashid’s
publication continues the gentle introduction into supervised training and
eventually building an artificial neural network.
In
training the neural network to become better at giving the desired output, the
network’s weights and biases (i.e. its parameters) are tweaked. If the output
has a too large an error, the tweaking processes is repeated until the error in
the output is acceptable and the network has turned out to be a workable model
to make a prediction or give another type of output.
In
the above example one moves forward and backward until the smallest reasonable
error is obtained. This is, again somewhat over-simplified how a
backpropagation algorithm functions in the training process of a network
towards making it a workable model. Note, “propagate” means to grow, extend, spread,
reproduce (which, inherently, are forward movements over time).
These
types of network, ANNs or other, are becoming both increasingly powerful and
diversified. They also are becoming increasingly accurate in identifying and
recognizing patterns in certain data sets of visual (i.e. photos, videos),
audio (i.e. spoken word, musical instruments, etc.) or other nature. These are
becoming more and more able to identify patterns, as well as humans are able to
and beyond what humans are able to handle.[19]
Dr.
HINTON, Geoffrey[20] is widely considered as one of the leading
academics in Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and specifically seen as a
leading pioneer in Deep Learning.[21]
Deep Learning, a type of Machine Learning, is highly dependent on various types
of Artificial Neural Network.[22]
Dr. Hinton’s student, Alex Krizhevsky, noticeably helped to boost the field of
computer vision by winning the 2012 ImageNet Competition and this by being the
first to use a neural network.
To round
the specific ‘ANN’ introduction up, let us imagine, perhaps in the processes of
AI research and specifically in its area similar to those of ANNs, solutions
can be thought up or are already being thought of that are less (or more)
brain-like or for which the researchers might feel less (or more) of a need to
make an analogy with a biological brain. Considering processes of innovation,
one might want to keep an open-mind to these seemingly different meanderings of
thought and creation.
Going
beyond the thinking of ANNs, one might want to fine-tune an understanding and
also consider diversity in forms and functions of these or other such networks.
There are, for instance, types going around with names such as ‘Deep Neural
Networks’ (DNNs) which, are usually extremely large and are usually applied to
process very large sets of data.[23]
One can also find terminologies such as the ‘Feedforward Neural Networks’
(FFNNs), which is said to be slightly more complex than the traditional and
old-school perceptron networks;[24]
‘Convolutional Neural Networks’ (CNNs), which are common in image recognition; ‘Recurrent
Neural Networks’ (RNNs) and its sub-type of ‘Long Short-term Memory’ networks
(LSTM), which apply feedback connection and which are used in Natural Language
Processing. These latter networks are claimed to still apply sigmoid functions,
contrary to the increased popularity of other functions.[25]
All of these and more are studied and developed in the fields of Machine
Learning and Deep Learning. All these networks would take us rather deep into
the technicalities of the field. You are invited to dig deeper and explore some
of the offered resources.
It
might be worthwhile to share that CNN solutions are particularly well-established
in computer vision. The neurons specialized in the visual cortex of the brain
and how these do or do not react to the stimuli coming into their brain region
from the eyes, were used as an inspiration in the development of the CNN. This
design helped to reduce some of the problems that were experienced with the
traditional artificial neural networks. CNNs do
have some shortcomings, as many of these cutting-edge inventions stil need to
be further researched and fine-tuned.[26]
In the process of improvement, innovation and fine-tuning, there are new networks continuously being invented. For instance, in answering some of the weaknesses of ‘Convolutional Neural Networks’ (CNNs), the “Capsule Networks (CapsNets)” are a relative recent invented answer, from a few years ago, by Hinton and his team.[27] It is also believed that these CapsNets mimic better how a human brain processes vision then what the CNNs have been enabled to offer up till now.
To put it too simple, it’s an improvement onto the previous versions of nodes in a network (a.k.a. ‘neurons’) and a neural network. It tries to “perform inverse graphics”, where inverse graphics is a process of extracting parameters from a visual that can identify location of an object within that visual. A capsule is a function that aids in the prediction of the “presence and …parameters of a particular object at a given location.”[28] The network hints at outperforming the traditional CNN in a number of ways such as the increased ability to identify additional yet functional parameters associated with an object. One can think of orientation of an object but also of its thickness, size, rotation and skew, spatial relationship, to name but a few.[29] Although a CNN can be of use to identify an object, it cannot offer an identification of that object’s location. Say a mother with a baby can be identified. The CNN cannot support the identification whether they are on the left of one’s visual field versus the same humans but on the right side of the image.[30] One might imagine the eventual use of this type of architectures in, for instance, autonomous vehicles.
This
type of machine learning method, a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), was
invented in 2014 by Dr. Goodfellow and Dr. Bengio, among others.[31]
It’s
an unsupervised learning technique that allows to go beyond historical data
(note, it is debatable that, most if not all data is inherently historical from
the moment following its creation). In a most basic sense, it is a type of
interaction, by means of algorithms (i.e. Generative Algorithms), between two
Artificial Neural
Networks.
The GANs allow to create new data (or what some refer to as “lookalike data”)[32] by applying features, by means of certain identified features, from the historical referenced data. For instance, a data set, existing of what we humans perceive as images, and then of a specific style, can allow this GANs’ process to generate a new (set of) image(s) in the style of the studied set. Images are but one media. It can handle digital music, digitized artworks, voices, faces, video… you name it. It can also cross-pollinate between media types, resulting in a hybrid between a set of digitized artworks and a landscape, resulting in a landscape “photo” in a style of the artwork data set. The re-combinations and reshufflings are quasi unlimited. Some more examples are of GANs types are those that can
…allow for black and white imagery to be turned
into colorful ones in various visual methods and styles.[33]
…turn descriptive text of, say different birds
into photo-realistic bird images.[34]
…create new images of food based on their
recipes and reference images.[35]
…turn a digitized oil painting into a photo-realistic
version of itself; turning a winter landscape into a summer landscape, and so
on.[36]
If
executed properly, for instance, the resulting image could make an observer
(i.e. a discriminator) decide that the new image (or data set) is as (authentic
as) the referenced image(s) or data set(s) (note: arguably, in the digital or
analog world, an image or any other media of content is a data set).
It
is also a technique whereby two neural networks contest with each other. They
do so in a game-like setting as it is known in the mathematical study of models
of strategic decision-making, entitled “Game Theory.” Game Theory is not to be
confused with the academic field of Ludology, the latter which is the social,
anthropological and cultural study of play and game design. While often one
network’s gain is the other network’s loss (i.e. a zero-sum game), this is not
always necessarily the case with GANs.
It
is said that GANs can also function and offer workable output with relatively
small data sets (which ic an advantage compared to some other techniques).[37]
It
has huge applications in the arts, advertising, film, animation, fashion
design, video gaming, etc. These professional fields are each individually
known as multi-billion dollar industries. Besides entertainment it is also of
use in the sciences such as physics, astronomy and so
on.
One can learn how to understand and build ANNs online via a
number of resources. Here below are a
few hand-picked projects that might offer a beginner’s taste to the technology.
Project #___: Making Machine Learning Neural Networks (for K12 students by
Oxford University)
Project#___: Rashid, T. (2016). Make Your Own Neural Network.
A project-driven book examining the very basics of neural networks and aiding a learning step by step into creating a network. Published as eBook or paper via CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
This might be easily digested by Middle Schools students or learners who cannot spend too much effort yet do want to learn about neural networks in an AI context.
[1] Schrittwieser, J. et al. (2020). Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by
Planning with a Learned Model. Online: arXiv.org, Cornell University;
Retrieved on April 1, 2020 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08265
[8] Rashid, T.
(2016). Make Your Own Neural Network.
CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
[9] Sabour, S. et al.
(2017). Dynamic Routing Between Capsules.
Online: arXiv.org, Cornell University; Retrieved on April 22, 2020 from
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.09829.pdf
[10] Sabbatini, R. (Feb
2003). Neurons and Synapses. The History
of Its Discovery. IV. The Discovery of the Synapse. Online:
cerebromente.org. Retrieved on April 23, 2020 from http://cerebromente.org.br/n17/history/neurons4_i.htm
[11] Tang
Y. et al (2001). Total regional and
global number of synapses in the human brain neocortex. In Synapse 2001;41:258–273.
[12] Zheng, Z., et al. (2018). A Complete Electron Microscopy Volume of the Brain of Adult Drosophila
melanogaster. In Cell, 174(3),
730–743.e22
[13] Haykin, S. (2008).
Neural Networks and Learning Machines. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall. p.1
[17] Samek, W. et al (2019). Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining
and Visualizing Deep Learning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence.
Switzerland: Springer. p.9
[21] Rumelhart,
David E.; Hinton, Geoffrey E.; Williams, Ronald J. (9 October 1986). “Learning
representations by back-propagating errors”. Nature. 323 (6088):
533–536
[23] de Marchi, L. et al.
(2019). Hands-on Neural Networks. Learn
How to Build and Train Your First Neural Network Model Using Python. Birmingham
& Mumbai: Packt Publishing. p. 9.
[24] Charniak, E. (2018). Introduction to Deep Learning.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. p. 10
[26] Géron, A. (February,
2018). Introducing capsule networks. How
CapsNets can overcome some shortcomings of CNNs, including requiring less
training data, preserving image details, and handling ambiguity. Online:
O’Reilly Media. Retrieved on April 22, 2020 from https://www.oreilly.com/content/introducing-capsule-networks/
[32] Skanski, S. (2020). Guide to Deep Learning. Basic Logical, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer Nature. p. 127
[33] Isola, P. et al.
(2016, 2018). Image-to-Image Translation
with Conditional Adversarial Networks. Online: arXiv.org, Cornell University; Retrieved on April 16,
2020 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07004
[34] Zhang, H. et al.
(2017). StackGAN: Text to Photo-realistic
Image Synthesis with Stacked Generative Adversarial Networks. Online: arXiv.org, Cornell University;
Retrieved
on April 16, 2020 from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.03242.pdf
[35] Bar El, O. et al.
(2019). GILT: Generating Images from Long
Text. Online: arXiv.org,
Cornell University; Retrieved
on April 16, 2020 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02404
[36] Zhu, J. (2017).
Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial
Networks. Online: arXiv.org,
Cornell University; Retrieved
on April 16, 2020 from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.10593.pdf