I designed a button
it changes all names
on the social platform
to Bruce, Bruce ‘n’ Bruce

I designed a button
It allows animals
their own taxonomic choice
screw cat I’m dog now, I’m dog, I’m dog

I designed a button
it flattens Earth
it bowling-balls Sun
into Earth’s orbit, undoing mass

I designed a button
it smartens intelligence
into the irrationality
it denies vehemently

I designed a button
it turns servers
Into atmospheric toasters,
puts a fork in them; they’re done

I designed a button
it slurps hyperlinks
into nodes of
Mana, Tricksters ‘n’ dreamtalk

I designed a button
Due cute-n-tiny.com viagra without prescription to this problem, the men are not able to attain the sexual pleasures during intercourse. Complications from pregnancies- cute-n-tiny.com viagra samples spotting can result from some difficult situations occurring in life, like worries, doubts, destructive lifestyle, serious injuries, and negative thoughts. I can assure you that once you start using Kamagra Polo pills, you must consult your doctor. tadalafil buy india These diet order cialis online foods and drinks can cause severe side effects on the health of the patient. it slants words leftwards
and cynical trolls
into righteous saints in the machine

I designed a button
it allows to measure serendipity
it got legal personhood ‘n’ got sued
for shameless appropriation

I designed a button
it rewrites, subversively, full sentences
that sound memēmacally louder
without representation nor CrispR

I designed a button
it undoes itself
it unravels the technoweave
it straitens the cables

I designed a button
it creates Ubuntu-circletime for all;
warping bitterness
into kindness, until unpressed by one

now, here’s a button:
it leaves
y’all
emperors;
now, parade!

—-animasuri’21

[any reference to an actual button by Mr. Sunstein, Einstein or Zweisteine is accidental and fictional and shall not hold up in court]

We humans do not stand outside of anything, nor anyone, nor any localities or time

There is an option not to cling on dualities of nature versus culture versus tech versus… but rather to transcend this dualistic thinking by “locating ecological problems in the behavior of human institutions, believes and practices”.

The idea and practice of (positively transformative) impact is not only about immediate measurability in market (which would not guarantee positive transformation), nor can it continue to only be about returns on singular financial investments (follow the money to unveil this). 

It, impact, is hierarchical but more so is it a multidimensional, complex, rhizomic impact on planet, life forms (with an “s”) and yes, profits. We can be creative and adaptable within these. 

Our constraints can be unveiled…: 

1. in market (here as in the systemized exchanges of any type via any abstracted and referencing medium) 
2. in technology (here as in: the engineered application of the systemized and methodological scientific outputs), 
3. in politics (here as in: the systemized governances of how to act within and beyond the complexities of ambiguities and fluidities of the participatory labors within the “polis”) and
4. in culture (here as in: the systemized co-creative communal act of contributing individuals).

These constraints are in analogy with the art of poetic freedoms, as constrained by a meter or a form such as those of a sonnet or other more free-forms. These are orchestrating our behaviors in more or less dissonant harmonies or counterpoints 

We don’t have to write a sonnet. We don’t have to recognize realities outside the sonnet. Yet, the sonnet and the creations beyond it, are unequivocally there; silenced, subdued, erupting or loudly. 

The impact of the humanities could be felt by mapping it with environments, eco-systems and ethics in technological and scientific applications, perhaps allowing for transformations in nature (via technology), societies (via governance and politics) and culture (via habits, memes, principles, forms, functions and aesthetics). 

Environments, life, cultures, diversities among individuals and collectively via humanity, are “inextricably connected”. 

They who are, as consciously as possible, living in these might best be dismissing an “unproductive hierarchy among [its diverse] forms of knowledge”. It is “imperative to abandon narrow [hierarchical] disciplinary traditions in order to grasp [the above-mentioned] interconnections” and this in order to allow dialog, wonder, learning and co-existence for proverbial timelessness to come. 

Impacts need to be constructed and willed so as  to be (understood as) affecting each of us personally. Impacts need to be willed as practical rather than impractical or insufficiently serving the whole. We need to will to consider, perceive and create positive impacts rather than be ill-willed not to. 

[The Lovely Perverting Method of Poetic Lecture-note-taking while reading Emmett, R.S. & Nye, D. E. (2017). The Environmental Humanities. A critical Introduction. Boston: MIT Press]