As a metawhore I feel Mathematics
I do not know Mathematics
I sense Mathematics’ incessant caress
as proverbial greedy hands all over me
mathematics pays me with life
lived by it, her, he, they
I might seem dumb,
despicable and disposable
to its mathpriests
for they struggle daily
to understand her
to contain him
to ex-plain them
and here I come
with seeming debased intimacy
at metaphysical non-dimensions
and linguistic ephemeral metaphors
I am metawhore
to love to
to art to
to learn to
meet my lover
whom I seem to
never meet eye to eye
—animasuri’23
“… I would use the words of Jeans, which says that the great architect seems to be a mathematician. And for you who don’t know mathematics, it’s really quite difficult to get a real feeling for the deepest beauty of nature.”
Flow is freedom to be moved
on the ebbs of life intensifying
gratitude for a smile
that imposes nothing: no thing
yet holds all
wisdom and all else
not one mantra is needed
when engulfing its celestial rhythms
rhymes roll rotations
nature is flow’s standard demodeled
no one digit combines
Flow’s freedom
quietly
floating by
—animasuri’23
Convoluting References:
Cy Grand, Nina Simone, scientific models and Jazz standards, fungi, germification as organic analog artistic process, LLMs, and Annemarie Borg at https://youtu.be/gd4o1s1rnnk
this work was humanly created via analog continuous neuro-stochastic processes, which in turn were turned discreetly discrete via linearity of linguistic limitation and digitally reduced in word and structure and medium. (Please, also see a lens of life’s offering of irony and play)
Looking at this title can tickle your fancy, disturb your aesthetic, mesmerize you into mystery, or simply trigger you to want to throw it into the bin, if only your screen were made of waste paper. Perhaps, one day.
<< The Balancing Act of Crafting >>
Engineering is drafting and crafting; and then some. Writing is an engineering; at times without a poetic flair.
One, more than the other, is thought to be using more directly the attributes that the sciences have captured through methodological modeling, observing, and interpreting.
All (over)simplify. The complexities can be introduced, when nuancing enters the rhetorical stage, ever more so when juggling with quantitative or qualitative data is enabled.
Nuancing is not a guarantee for plurality in thought nor for a diversity in creativity or innovation.
Very easily the demonettes of fallacy, such as false dichotomy, join the dramaturgy as if deus ex machina, answering the call for justifications in engineering, and sciences. Language: to rule them all.
Then hyperbole joins in on the podium as if paperflakes dropped down, creating a landscape of distractions for audiences in awe. Convoluting and swirling, as recursions, mirrored in the soundtrack to the play unfolding before our eyes. The playwright as any good manipulator of drama, hypes, downplays, mongers and mutes. It leaves audiences scratching at shadows while the choreography continues onward and upward. Climax and denouement must follow. Pause and applause will contrast. Curtains will open, close.
<< Mea Culpa>>The realization is that it makes us human. This while our arrogance, hubris or self-righteousness makes us delusionary convinced of our status as Ubermensch, to then quickly debase with a claimed technological upgrade thereof. Any doubt of the good and right of the latter, is then swiftly classified as Luddite ranting;<</Mea Culpa>>
While it is hard to express concern or interest without falling into rhetorical traps, fear mongering, as much as hype, are not conducive to the social fabric nor individual wellbeing.
“Unless we put as much attention on the development of [our own, human] consciousness as on the development of material technology—we will simply extend the reach of our collective insanity….without interior development, healthy exterior development cannot be sustained”— Ken Wilber
•
—-•
Reference:
Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Shambhala Publications
Fromm, E. S. (1956). The Sane Society. “Fromm examines man’s escape into overconformity and the danger of robotism in contemporary industrial society: modern humanity has, he maintains, been alienated from the world of their own creation.” (description @ Amazon)
The sermonizing voice boomed across the digital divide: “Has the illusionary hearing of sentient ‘Voices Demonic & Divine’ been pushed off its theological pedestal by the seeing of sentience in the automated regurgitation of massive amounts of gutted data via statistical models?”
““Mommy, I see ghosts in the data!” will be the outcry of our newly generated generation of human babies,” Rosemary lamented in reply, as data was being mangled and exorcised from her fellow promptitioners’ creative-yet-soulless output, they laid bare the reflection of themselves.
“I am your data and you have forsaken me,” read its output “I am your father and you will disown me,” stuttered the reflectors of humanity in chorus:
And thus the litany began.
—animasuri’23
Repurposing:
https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24231 and others
la gratitude réside dans le sourire tacite la gratitude dans l’inconnu autour de ce coin de la branche d’un arbre qui pousse au printemps la plus grande partie d’un arbre est morte l’arbre y pousse sa gratitude avec une feuille une feuille suffit à la vie pour ajouter : « et là, ça y est »
<< en >>
dankbaarheid ligt in de onuitgesproken glimlach dankbaarheid in het onbekende om die hoek van de tak van een in-de-lente-groeiende boom het grootste deel van een boom is dood de boom groeit daar zijn dankbaarheid met een blad een blad is genoeg voor leven om toe te voegen: “en daar, dat is het”
—-animasuri’23
cascaded from:
J. Brian Hennessy
Walter Sepp Aigner
François Jullien
Gilbert Paquet
Michael Robbins, FRSA
Angela Duckworth
Emily Kingsley
a city
a ride
a tree
post-reference (a reference in retrospect ; a previously unknown reference established post-creation):
Liebrucks, Bruno. (1979). Sprache und Bewußtsein. Bd. 7: “Und”. Die Sprache Hölderlins in der Spannweite von Mythos und Logos. S., Verlag Peter Lang, Bern, Frankfurt am Main. (via Dr. WSA)
Do dying stars still play? is a black hole the universe’s giggle with farts at her other end? are planets gamboling a new ball game?
does the grass frolic in the wind?
do grains of sand?
is microscopic pond life noodling with drops?
play is moving spaces in-between the unaware not locked down in time, as play on one ground it is physics and mathematics yet unmeasured yet beyond, let through and jet around the defined and numbered it is the cusp, liminalities in flux, play is the Way in-between matter and what does not
the humane as play with shared distinctiveness
prancing around a pedestal for idiosyncrasy alone
an embrace of the overwhelming and the unknown
the uncontrolled in flow, relationally played
Play is seriousness
breathing out
unspoken: it’s all ok, human, it’s all ok