“I am the librarian
if I were The Bookless Librarian
it would be: they ate it all
if termites hadn’t taken
I would not be this token Librarian
prompting a chair out of thin air
without foundations to reference
the tiles slammed together
as cover-to-covers do with dust clouds
expelled to breathe-sneeze
as output and deliriously welcomed
as divinely insightful
I am the librarian,
punch cards, card catalogs, ink blots: gone
accordions of accolades and all words by me
have I the ability to imagine myself otherwise
all the resources all the mice and all the men
yet stuck I am in fumigation and sfumato,
being now seeking clips and coupons
to a better life of quotes tomorrow
I am covering this rebound bundle
sliding loans for borrowers in carts for archives
among these on a page xiii I am the librarian
someone underlined but me
while patrons enjoy the
peace and echo
of empty space
I am the librarian who
makes book ends
meet”
—animasuri’24
—-•
Triggers
(Thank you, Mr. George Keller Hart for independently corroborating some attributes, for independently offering resources to the public, and for adding critical value with your posts on LinkedIn)
Arch Daily. (n.d.). Libraries. 680 Results for “libraries.” https://lnkd.in/gsKfYdfb
AI Lab, The. (n.d.). Academic Insight Lab. https://academicinsightlab.org/ AND https://www.youtube.com/@AcademicInsightLab/videos
AskYourPDF. https://askyourpdf.com/
Australian National Library. (2020). T.R.A.A.P Test. https://libguides.anu.edu.au/c.php?g=906019&p=6594267 See The CRAAP Test by “Sarah Blakeslee and the librarians at California State University’s Meriam Library in 2004”
Bellingcat. (2023). Bellingcat’s Online Investigation Toolkit. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18rtqh8EG2q1xBo2cLNyhIDuK9jrPGwYr9DI2UncoqJQ/edit#gid=930747607
Blakeslee, S., et al. (2004). The CRAAP Test. Online: California State University’s Meriam Library. https://library.csuchico.edu/sites/default/files/craap-test.pdf AND https://libguides.cdu.edu.au/c.php?g=167998&p=6962967
British Columbia Library, University of_. ( ). Evaluating Information Sources. https://guides.library.ubc.ca/c.php?g=703764&p=5004272
Caulfield, M. (2019). SIFT (The Four Moves). Blog: Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/ AND https://mikecaulfield.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/sift-infographic.png
Cherner, J. (2022, July 18). 26 Stunning University Libraries Around the World You Need to See. Blog: Architecture+Design https://lnkd.in/griQdhUA
Connected Papers. Explore connected papers in a visual graph. https://lnkd.in/gDHwxgyT
Consensus. AI Search Engine for Research. Consensus is a search engine that uses AI to find insights in research papers. https://lnkd.in/g-kKRBbb
Cornell University. (n.d.). Evaluating Information. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/evaluate
Cornell University Task Force. (2023, December). Generative AI in Academic Research: Perspectives and Cultural Norms. https://it.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/itc-drupal10-files/Generative%20AI%20in%20Research_%20Cornell%20Task%20Force%20Report-Dec2023.pdf
Dezeen. (n.d.). Libraries. https://lnkd.in/guMUy5yQ
Dimensions.ai. (2024, Feb). Dimensions Research GPT on ChatGPT. https://www.dimensions.ai/products/all-products/dimensions-research-gpt/
Dublin, University College Library. (2021). Search this Guide Evaluating Information: Why Evaluate? https://libguides.ucd.ie/c.php?g=657880
Elicit. Explore the scientific literature. https://lnkd.in/geW2vzdb
ExplainPaper. The Fastest Way to Read Research Papers. Upload a paper, highlight confusing text, get an explanation. We make research papers easy to read. https://lnkd.in/gUuD8rWM
Gregory Bateson. (1935). 199. Culture Contact and Schismogenesis. Man, 35, 178–183. https://lnkd.in/gWxvPu2y
Hall, J. M. (2016). Evaluating Resources A guide to evaluating search engines, books, articles and websites for research. Online: University of Regina Library. https://library.uregina.ca/ld.php?content_id=27763439 via https://library.uregina.ca/c.php?g=606029
Harvard Library. (2021). “Fake News”, Disinformation, and Propaganda. https://guides.library.harvard.edu/fake
Henley, J. (2024, January 8). Libraries for the future: Europe’s new wave of ‘meeting places for the mind.’Online: The Guardian https://lnkd.in/gHkkjAVx Thank you, Patrick Tanguay
inciteful. (2024). Tools to help you accelerate your research. https://inciteful.xyz/ alternative citation: Weishuhn, M. (2024). Inciteful: Citation network exploration.
Jesson, J., Matheson, L., Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Metz, R (2029). These people do not exist. Why websites are churning out fake images of people (and cats). Online: CNN Business. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/02/28/tech/ai-fake-faces/index.html AND https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
Mandalios, J. (2013). RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate Internet sources. Journal of Information Science, 39(4), 470-478. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1177/0165551513478889
Miao, F. C., Holmes, W. , et al.(2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Online: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
MirrorThink. Empowering Thinkers. Enhance your scientific research in minutes. https://mirrorthink.ai/
Morris, M. R. (2023, April 4). Scientists’ Perspectives on the Potential for Generative AI in their Fields. arXiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01420v1
OpenAlex. Search and analyze the world’s research. https://openalex.org/
OpenRead. Paper, has never been so beautiful, powerful, intuitive. https://www.openread.academy/?ref=taaft
Ordway, D. M. (2017). How to tell good research from flawed research: 13 questions journalists should ask. Online: The Journalist’s Resource. https://journalistsresource.org/media/good-research-bad-quality-journalism-tips/
Paper Digest. The platform to follow, search, review & rewrite scientific literature with no hallucinations.
https://www.paperdigest.org/
Perplexity. Where Knowledge Begins. https://www.perplexity.ai/
Petiška, E. (2023). ChatGPT cites the most-cited articles and journals, relying solely on Google Scholar’s citation counts. As a result, AI may amplify the Matthew Effect in environmental science. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2304/2304.06794.pdf
Pinzolits, R. (2024). AI in academia: An overview of selected tools and their areas of application. MAP Education and Humanities, 4, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.53880/2744-2373.2023.4.37
R Discovery. Your #1 AI companion for literature search! R Discovery accelerates your research discovery journey, with latest and relevant content in your area of interest. https://discovery.researcher.life/
Research Rabbit. https://researchrabbitapp.com/home
Sanderson, K. (2023). AI science search engines are exploding in number—Are they any good? Nature, 616(7958), 639–640. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01273-w
Schäfer, M. (2023, May). The Notorious GPT: science communication in the age of artificial intelligence. IN: Journal of Science Communication. 22(02)(2023)Y02 1-15. Retrieved January 31, 2024, from https://jcom.sissa.it/article/pubid/JCOM_2202_2023_Y02/
Scholarcy. The AI-powered article summarizer. https://www.scholarcy.com/?ref=taaft
SciLink. Accelerate Your Research Workflow. https://www.scilynk.com/
Scinapse. Where Minutes Matter. Quickly tap into the wisdom of leading scientists. https://www.scinapse.io/
SciSpace. Do hours worth of reading in minutes. scispace.com https://typeset.io/
Scite. assistant by Scite. https://scite.ai/assistant?
Semantic Scholar. A free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature. https://www.semanticscholar.org/
Sourcely. Finish Your Research in Minutes. Save Your Sleep. https://www.sourcely.net/
Tang, A., Li, K. K., Kwok, K. O., Cao, L., Luong, S., & Tam, W. (2023). The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing. Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 10.1111/jnu.12938. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12938
TinEye. Reverse Image Search. Find where images appear online. https://tineye.com/
TLDRthis. Summarize any | in a click. https://www.tldrthis.com/
Trust it or Trash it. (2013). http://www.trustortrash.org/
Tufts Libraries. (2020). Tisch Library’s guide to evaluating information. Online: Tufts University. https://researchguides.library.tufts.edu/EvaluatingInfo
Van Noorden, R. (2023). ChatGPT-like AIs are coming to major science search engines. Nature, 620(7973), 258–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02470-3
Watkins, R. Guidance for researchers and peer-reviewers on the ethical use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in scientific research workflows. AI Ethics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00294-5
Woolcott, L., Shiri, A. (2023). Discoverability in Digital Repositories: Systems, Perspectives, and User Studies. Routledge Guides to Practice in Libraries, Archives and Information Science. Routledge.
Zimdars, M. False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical “News” Sources. https://docs.google.com/document/d/10eA5-mCZLSS4MQY5QGb5ewC3VAL6pLkT53V_81ZyitM/preview
GPT. (2024). “The best Research GPTs in 2024.”https://gptstore.ai/gpts/categories/research AnalyzePaper. https://danielmiessler.com/ | AskYourPDF Research Assistant. https://askyourpdf.com/ ScholarAI. Experience Super-Powered AI Research Beyond ChatGPT. https://scholarai.io/ Academic PI in Chinese By Shang Dabao AND https://www.whatplugin.ai/category/academic-research
