Isn’t that indeed the debate we could be having; to identify those traits that make you human.

Then, if we were having the debate, would we be continuing a bit further with our sharing of thought, perhaps into a what-if scenario of the (un)likelihood of ever coming to a monolithic consensus (which I secretly hope we do not ever entirely get to)?

Would we then dare & wonder about what a next action would be toward those “certifiable” as having (more) human traits (then others)? Does this start to ring as history, folding back onto our present future conditional:

Would it be as the linearity of IQ or Mensa tests, a lean Blackbelt certification, or as a certificate of a tertiary education?

Would it be as if being an academic or professional field labeled with a positive bias compared to those fields or professions labeled by some through a lesser lens?

For ease of sample generic viagra purchase, one can easily buy Kaamgra soft online from certified online pharmacy stores. Several recent studies support using purchase cheap cialis http://amerikabulteni.com/2013/10/13/beyzbolda-lig-sampiyonluklarinda-heyecan-firtinasi-suruyor/ for every planned lovemaking activity. Dosage 5mg cialis tablets has to be taken only once in 24 hours duration and you should try to take it with great carefulness utilizing significant dosages for a prolonged duration of time causes the erection to occur. Investigations into the mechanisms of how bi-polar issues are influenced by discount levitra tamoxifen citrate are ongoing.

Would it perhaps be implemented as glass ceilings or would it be “cleverly”, systematically embedded as multiple “minutia” of regulatory classification, frivolously sprinkled with sweetness of segregation?

Would it be conceivable that such consensus would result in the stitching of geometric shapes onto our more or less human suits? Would it be imaginable to be applied as a Spartan society & their pragmatic ravines?

Would we escalate & medicalize, wall-off, criminalize?

Would we then dehumanize.

—-animasuri’21