Not the more it reads not only a book or a post or a newsflash
not only another virtual world or yet another kind (of) stranger, passing by,
and their view on today’s weather, the mundane or the political landscape
nor who they who wonder who on earth, as wise owls, who its readership could be, who
rather the profounder i read with others, the confounder the read,
and am being read by others, The Confounders, as mediators, in a metaphysical meet
knowingly, partly, differently, surely, desirably, fully unnecessary, and not,
and, the more we could become:
outwardly silent inwardly tumultuously, unlocked yet not unhinged
rigorous and organized focused and diversified confidently doubtful, yet caring
not necessarily knowledgable yet more aware of what we are not aware of
what we each were, are, might not be refined(,) yet toward
what richness in relating with others we still have to learn from note-taking preceding turning to dust
The Read, that finite aspiration That Rosetta Stone projected That Babel bubbling brook
the whisper of a common endearing shared life:
a distributed ping of a finger tip and information packages in a hug from their eyes:
it is it that scrapes you at the sedentary bottom of your riverbed
yet it’s i who reads you: do you read?
—animasuri’24
—-• triggers
Bryda G, Costa AP. (2023). Qualitative Research in Digital Era: Innovations, Methodologies and Collaborations. IN: Social Sciences. 2023; 12(10):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100570
Banner, J. M. Jr. (2021). The Ever-Changing Past: Why All History Is Revisionist History. Yale University Press.
Banner, J. M. jr. (2022). All History Is Revisionist History. Ever since Thucydides dismissed Herodotus, historians have differed about the past. IN: Humanities. The Magazine of the National Endowment for the Humanities. Summer 2022 issue. Online: National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). https://www.neh.gov/article/all-history-revisionist-history
Bassett, C. (2019). The computational therapeutic: exploring Weizenbaum’s ELIZA as a history of the present. IN: AI & Soc 34, 803–812 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0825-9
Wonder is while extensive extensively challenged censored, ridiculed until claimed kaput
it is
extrinsically debased, fought as frivolous flâneuring or excommunicated to pampered youth
it is
It is intrinsically tickled, harvested and fermented as kefir flowers overwhelming the milk jar
it is
wonder as life has a way to bloom disautomated, in the aridest of mechanical deserts
it is
as that brain occurring in the cosmos with likelihood of monkey’s Shakespeare and yet
it is
wonder as key welcoming entrance glimpses onto the limen of the real
I wonder: is it
—animasuri’24
—-• trigger
Hofstadter, D. (2023, July 13). Learn a Foreign Language Before It’s Too Late. AI translators may seem wondrous but they also erode a major part of what it is to be human. IN: Ideas. Online: The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/07/the-terrible-downside-of-ai-language-translation/674687/
In the asylum of the algorithm “there is no democracy”
“Inmates are tracked without their consent, into well-demarcated groups”
If it becomes painful, think someone’s ode becomes the poetry of
our social relations and in that panopticon you no longer have to worry
about accountability about care the algorithm is about and its pincer-grip
is the new groping of online submission to an all-blinding eye.
—animasuri’24
—- trigger
Albert, D. (2001, Sep 5). Introduction. IN: Gatto, J. T. (1992, 2005). Dumbing Us Down. The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling. p. xvii (Introduction). Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers. Last retrieved on September 7, 2023 from https://archive.org/search?query=Dumbing+Us+Down
critical theorist critical of practice critically practicing theoretical thought of tautological angles or paradoxicalities on how to be defrocking angelic bends
critical cook critical of ingredients cringingly critiquing clientele and groping bus boys ‘cause no one will tell and their deadly silence is golden
critical autonomous -weapon manufacturer critically self-aware of collaterality considering diversifying ‘n’ circular economics critically handpicking raw materials
critical sociopath wannabes critically of who to pick on or how to measure greediness critiquing their affect on well-being of others and which cleaning product is not eco-friendly
criticality confused with sarcasm and bitterness anti-flowerpower analysis or happy-happy-joy-joy engine grease with a flair of matchmaking contradiction into ambiguity
Some say I’m too rational, no, too realistic, when I say: one day I will die; not
at this particular moment of writing this ‘not,’ so: no need for dismay, not to fray
From there, our shared fabric, I reverse imagineered as trompe l’œil: always in our shared compound minds
of living life to the fullest here and now back to this exact mindful moment: back to this instant sensation, actually,
of living with you with care, with kindness: with simple daily work we can do; together.
as I had my synthetic constructs output, choreographically, to visceral and venerable visitors: at the wooden gate of our city state
today we live, today we think, today we do:
—animasuri’24
Bridges A. D., Chittka L. (2023) Escaping anthropocentrism in the study of non-human culture: Comment on “Blind alleys and fruitful pathways in the comparative study of cultural cognition” by Andrew Whiten. Physics of Life Reviews 44, 267-269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2023.01.008
Bridges A. D., MaBouDi H., Procenko O., Lockwood C., Mohammed Y., Kowalewska A., Romero-Gonzalez E., Woodgate J. L. & Chittka L. (2023) Bumblebees acquire alternative puzzlebox solutions via social learning. PLoS Biology21(3): e3002019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002019
Annabelle lives in a place where bookshelves are censored wooden, plastic, woven reed these controlling tangibles are controlled and outlawed here
Andrew on the other hand lives where colophons are; you know, these things with title, names , year of print or anything to identify source cut out, filtered out, out dated these are
Alisha lives in a place where paper is contraband surely papyrus, parchment, leather-bound or anything scraped for scraps with ink blobs, ink odor, or ink smear are controlled substances
Ali on the other hand lives where the word ‘literature’ gets uttering people band and ‘bande dessinée’ is a withering underground silent-musical theater group
All live in a world where inference is an only source connecting the dots where others had not trigger-happy mines of bitter patterns secret assets as test data groups driven by Moore’s Law and redacted data
Kummer, M., Stephan, F. (1996). On the Structure of Degrees of Inferability. IN: Journal of Computer and System Sciences 52, no. 2. April 1, 1996: 214–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1996.0018
Lavigne, S. (2023). Scrapism: A Manifesto. Online: Critical AI. Volume 1, Issue 1-2, October 1, 2023. Rutgers University/ Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703X-10734046
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. (2018, Oct. 12). A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI. Online: Open LawArXiv Repository. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf
Automated summaries, summon trust, brazenly bridging voids of knowing and relevance.
Not penned are the words, therefore thou dost trust; not perused the manuscript, therefore ye trust.
Consequential trust, as thy rigid law of physics, a gravitational pull to machined rule, a law of efficient attraction, it demands what ye shall not know.
Not having experienced the theme, therefore thou dost trust; not lived its corpus, therefore ye trust.
Revision of relevance to the unread, awaken, succumbing to insights undead, machined authority from a life unlived, and cleverness uncorporated.
Thou knowest not the author, the thought, the action, the clockmaker, the bricklayer, nor thy need, serendipitously found.
Therefore, thou shalt come to co-live a circular gist, lacking lived experience’s necessity, or intentionality of the read.
—animasuri’24
— triggers
Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What Computers Still Can’t Do. A Critique of Artificial Reason. Boston, MA: MIT Press
Searle J.R. (1980). Minds, Brains, and Programs. IN: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1980;3(3):417-424. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00005756
