I can talk inside my head:
conversations and representations,
senses quasi unseeded by bio-electricity off of peripheral nerves,
yet ever streaming,
having vague vagaries letting me ask:

can I talk with your voice inside my head?
thinking your intonations,
thinking your frequencies, crinkling,
your overtones, timbres, raspiness, tremors,
thinking your idiosyncratic metalinguistics,

thinking your pauses and synchronous body
movements, and what about those offbeat signals;
introducing Doppler effects
in your voice’s pitch: is your voice a parasocial interaction
when entering my thoughts?

as a non-illusionary experience,
considering that my human cognition
is not only switched-on when stimulated, prodded, prompted:
I can’t let machinery voice thoughts ignoring kinds of knowledge,
as intelligentsia summarizing memories where meaning is instituted

as a voice disembodied recomposed
by imaginaries I hear your voice inside my head
while you have long gone, switched off, decalculated, seized to exist
except then on carrier waves
in metaphysical meaning within cranial ceilings.

I hear you

                             —animasuri’24

If one moment you are calculable
that integer away from being retractable

decidably halted when switched off
deterministically streamlined

in brand, brotherhood and brothel
artificialized to believe abundance of choice

and programmed
for nagging and anxious urging since birth

you have become finite
and solvably collectively self-contained

in a corset algorithm’d by others
halted and stunned

while running
your tracks and rat races

as fast as you can, running:
that moving way you know

to stand out, running
following generated style elsewhere

you might’ve been tool’d
and yet, yes stilled and masked

you’re hugged
you belong.

                             —animasuri’24

If there is a universal.
there does not exist
a single, universal algorithm

—Do the Opposite!

enabling determining with correctness
for every possible program
every possible process, any mechanism

—Do the Opposite!

—existing or theoretical—
whether program, process and mechanism
will halt or run forever

—Do the Opposite!

on any given input
with thermodynamics and
Kelvin’s equalizing coldness

—Do the Opposite!

the universal
of non-existence
of a universal solution

—Do the Opposite!

of an all encompassing singularity
its non-existence in absolutes
justifies existence of divergences

—Do the Opposite!

any ultimatum attempting
halt or loop forever for all
has a likelihood to fail

—Do the Opposite!

with failure if it too submitting
is but a perspective
taken from intent

—Do the Opposite!

failure, ah soil for fertility, transcoded
is emergence observed
if not with certainty

—Do the Opposite!

that’s a solution
of non-absoluteness
by eating itself giving birth

—Do the Opposite!

a forbidden fruit, an apple,
a sin, a hack, a mod, a jailbreak
an affordance false, a law broken

—Do the Opposite!

turned into actuality of
life, if complexes of oppositions
do they loop or do they end?

Yet, if life
more than pathological programs
where pathologies

trimmed to a powder of hope: sneeze
doing the opposite of the opposite
of the opposite of a stone

infinitely consistent:
loop and halt
simultaneously and error prone

unanswering, do the opposite:

                    —animasuri’24

a trigger

Copeland, B. J. (ed.), 2004, The Essential Turing: Seminal Writings in Computing, Logic, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Artificial Life, Oxford: Clarendon
Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250791.001.0001