Through his designer sight he became his designed environment his critical distance evaporated
His critique equated to janitorial disgruntlement when his premise had footprints on the ceiling, walls and floor
as if his soul had been trampled on his baby dropped his layer of paint not pampered
His designed world was but a fold in the fabric a string of beads slid along crevices of his desires and existence while suckled remained hidden from insight
I can hear the words and pitch to her songs perfectly once I try to sing ’m all become ephemeral wiped with a sponge of transformation from mind to pressure and absence of muscle memory
I can eloquently separate the words to a grand speech once on stage, even at that kitchen table with mom grammar and syntax as vassals of order and sequence never rsvp’ed and retired from their halls of reverberation
I can sense the confidence in verbose presentation I can sense perfection in the plucking of a string ’n’ vocal cord I can feel the energy, the passion, the skill ah, if only
His culture of fear fear of loss; if his rhetorical roots thus are his reason for being as reverting to force-for-the-taking
as a bloated soldier not empowered yet debased; if a delegated enforcer thus is an intoxication with warped desires as forcefully legitimized law lacking ethics
his utterances to power yet veil deep; if shrouded in the ordered thus are reverting to force with justification as of Übermensch given as ordained
and it is only natural to horde yet repetitive words; if hammers and fists thus known all to well to well-oiled men as much as only natural to snort
This is his day he lost power and opted for force thus as if yet: stolen
Why let us wish you an invisible Thursday. Be done with it. Get it over with. Fold it and stuff it under a week’s worth of carpet. As all good bachelors are destined to do once or other day. But no. Not on Thursdays. Has one ever acknowledged a Thursday’s bachelor? By thunder, no. Procrastinate from Sundays to Wednesdays. Have a day left out to grow envious of and we’ll call Friday-Saturdays that weekend we all imagined for good measure. Immeasurably if all else failed that day, chew on this, for isn’t chewing that repetitive act life seems to deny us to be bored with?
We expect Jean and the others We expect you to like each other
We expect you to like Jean We expect Jean to like you
“Each of us expects” Jean “to like the others” Therefore: “We expect” Jean “to like each other”
Jeans seem to us More or less than himselves
And yet, out of the blue denim: Who are you?
—animasuri’24
Some Triggers:
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
Phillips, D. C. (1995). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177059
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Ever since language and learning. afterthoughts on the Piaget-Chomsky debate. IN: Cognition, 50(1–3) (1994) 315-346. Elsevier Science https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90034-5 pp. 328-329.