If I had not constructed “we” then “we” would not exist; more so the reverse, one might so insist

if there were no mi followed by silence in-between it & the do, then sol-itude of the reverberating drone would drown away any harmony

if the “amoeba” did not transgress protoplasticllly, into evolutions, then no organization of organs as enablements through a body, would come to do what I do: an orchestration of neurons, beyond the brain & in baroque-like counterpoint with microbiomes, across a cooperative body I call I

if I were but I then I would not need semiotics, since expressing meaning, as aesthetic or ethic, in-between I & my reflection, would be as Narcissus out of social context: meaninglessly pining away

If I were merely I, I would need not construct money to trade, be mesmerized by titles to bear, not impose soldiers to hold, not pain nor laughter to share. Things would be bare of value; mere things out there

It is the most well-known forms of male sexual online viagra order dysfunction. The unfortunate gentleman, generic levitra pill who was involved in the study, just suffered an extreme reaction to the pathogenic bacteria. Blurred vision, headaches, get viagra prescription back pain, headaches and runny noses are common among users of these prescriptions. Studies have found that poor cheap viagra australia eating habits that cause disability.

If I were but I in an I-land adrift through expanding space, then I would be an aberration as much as what I might wonder about intelligent life among the stars

It is in-between the processes of the physical irrefutability that I is not 1 & that we co-construct meaning, to do for me, so as to be & then let go of the solitudes of I

—-animasuri’21