iOi is a continuation from the animasuri/blog repository. Here I let go of ideas. This is in a neutral sense, and as part of a general mechanism.
In analogy, some might recognize that these mechanisms are used as bank accounts or other such instruments would be applied to harvest or to deposit or expand on a financial resource.
Though, the analogy only extends to the implied process and mechanisms. Contrary to possible impressions, merely by using the financial as a reference, there is no sympathy within this blog for this analogy.
On the contrary, the analogy is intended to use a narrative that seems all too well accepted by too many while the analogy into other realms is too often ignored or debased.
In this case my resources are not financial but rather, as mentioned, they are ideas that sprout into existence in my mind (or surely any other mind) that I harvested, deposited and let grow here (to now shift to the implied analogy of agricultural resources free for the picking).
Some ideas might crash, some might be bad investments, some might flourish yet all ideas function as instances of interruption.
Why let us wish you an invisible Thursday. Be done with it. Get it over with. Fold it and stuff it under a week’s worth of carpet. As all good bachelors are destined to do once or other day. But no. Not on Thursdays. Has one ever acknowledged a Thursday’s bachelor? By thunder, no. Procrastinate from Sundays to Wednesdays. Have a day left out to grow envious of and we’ll call Friday-Saturdays that weekend we all imagined for good measure. Immeasurably if all else failed that day, chew on this, for isn’t chewing that repetitive act life seems to deny us to be bored with?
We expect Jean and the others We expect you to like each other
We expect you to like Jean We expect Jean to like you
“Each of us expects” Jean “to like the others” Therefore: “We expect” Jean “to like each other”
Jeans seem to us More or less than himselves
And yet, out of the blue denim: Who are you?
—animasuri’24
Some Triggers:
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
Phillips, D. C. (1995). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177059
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Ever since language and learning. afterthoughts on the Piaget-Chomsky debate. IN: Cognition, 50(1–3) (1994) 315-346. Elsevier Science https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90034-5 pp. 328-329.
The shiny surface is licked by a raspy cat tongue he carries around, cat and all, as if in the other pocket from the rabbit’s foot, scraped white
fur, or is it German, for the purpose of having the thing mentioned as a function of being as much as saying nothing with as many words:
“whatever the passions, the birds sing on” as clockwork, an early glimmered soloist sounds through the smallness of a rooftop opening: weeny window into the world
If yet a slurped pebble, a flicked calculus heard afar of a tiny courages stone and language games fixed in the changes of a tight tied-on shoe: cats do lick
of rules and regulations for all language is heteroglossic and games are not executed in a sand-strewn place for combat as bloodshed alone is but a word when the swording thumb points down
stolen if its etymology is written instead? unheard or is it novel and continuing to develop meaning neither here nor there not yours nor mine as fake affordances
he uses it as such he has meaning drinking from his hand gulping, without pause from his hand alone diverse tongues and all
—animasuri’24
Some Triggers
Bakhtin, M. M., Emerson, C., Holquist, M. (Trans.). (1981, 2011). The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Slavic Series No. 1. Austin, Texas, USA: University of Texas Press. Or, heterogeneously: https://archive.org/search?query=Bakhtin
If there is a universal. there does not exist a single, universal algorithm
—Do the Opposite!
enabling determining with correctness for every possible program every possible process, any mechanism
—Do the Opposite!
—existing or theoretical— whether program, process and mechanism will halt or run forever
—Do the Opposite!
on any given input with thermodynamics and Kelvin’s equalizing coldness
—Do the Opposite!
the universal of non-existence of a universal solution
—Do the Opposite!
of an all encompassing singularity its non-existence in absolutes justifies existence of divergences
—Do the Opposite!
any ultimatum attempting halt or loop forever for all has a likelihood to fail
—Do the Opposite!
with failure if it too submitting is but a perspective taken from intent
—Do the Opposite!
failure, ah soil for fertility, transcoded is emergence observed if not with certainty
—Do the Opposite!
that’s a solution of non-absoluteness by eating itself giving birth
—Do the Opposite!
a forbidden fruit, an apple, a sin, a hack, a mod, a jailbreak an affordance false, a law broken
—Do the Opposite!
turned into actuality of life, if complexes of oppositions do they loop or do they end?
Yet, if life more than pathological programs where pathologies
trimmed to a powder of hope: sneeze doing the opposite of the opposite of the opposite of a stone
infinitely consistent: loop and halt simultaneously and error prone
unanswering, do the opposite:
—animasuri’24
a trigger
Copeland, B. J. (ed.), 2004, The Essential Turing: Seminal Writings in Computing, Logic, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Artificial Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250791.001.0001